First interactive medical iPad iBook arrives in Apple’s bookstore, free to download

http://cdn.imedicalapps.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/01-300x225.png

When Apple announced iBooks 2 and iBooks author, there was much excitement amongst the medical tech community about the possibility of physicians creating their own interactive textbooks.

Last Friday saw the release of the first interactive medical textbook, created by Dr. Ed Wallitt, Founder of Podmedics.com.

We recently reviewed PodMedics, a UK based site which offers a range of medical podcasts for medical students and junior doctors alike.

The iBook entitled, The Podmedics Do Surgery, is a free medical textbook designed for medical students. It combines text, interactive images, video lectures and questions in one place and is a first for medical education.

iMedicalApps was able to exclusively catch up with Dr. Wallitt and find out more about the creation process including his experiences using iBooks Author.

Why did you pick the iBooks format?

Dr. Wallitt: The new iBooks format provides the opportunity to provide a wide range of different types of learning materials in one integrated textbook. It goes beyond just simple text, allowing you to insert interactive images, videos and review questions. This is perfect for us at Podmedics because we have been using these materials on our website.

Secondly, we saw the opportunity to be at the cutting edge of this brand-new and exciting technological advance in medical education.

What was your experience of using iBooks author?

Dr. Wallitt: On the whole, very positive. If you have any experience with using applications from iWorks such as Keynote, Pages or Numbers it is very easy to pick up. Myself, Stevan Wing and Bernard Ho managed to put together the whole iBook within a couple of weeks, working on it on the odd evening and weekend.

Saying that, there are still a number of issues within the program. This mainly has to do with crafting the flow of your document so that it displays well in both portrait and landscape mode on the iPad. We had to do a number of revisions because of this problem, and it cost us a significant amount of time.

Many authors have voiced concerns about the user agreement. What is your opinion of this?

Dr. Wallitt: It is easy to understand why people might be upset with having to hand over their work to Apple for approval. However, this is not really different to the state of play within the App Store and is fairly consistent across the whole industry. Most companies that provide creative tools that allow users to create content for their platforms have a similar end user agreement.

At Podmedics we did not spend a long time looking at this because we wanted to produce a free textbook and the user agreement is therefore not as punitive towards us compared with paid books.

Could you elaborate on the overall difficulty of textbook creation from a technical viewpoint?

Dr. Wallitt: From a technical perspective it was incredibly easy to create. In the past, to create a similar textbook would have required a detailed knowledge of Xcode, Objective-C and Cocoa touch. However with iBooks author, Apple have created a gateway for anyone with any word processing ability to create compelling and high-quality content.

What were the major problems encountered in the process?

Dr. Wallitt: The biggest issue for us has been managing to get the completed iBook uploaded and published on the iBook store. The textbook iBook store is currently not available in the UK, but UK authors of iBooks can still publish them on the US store. However, we have still not even been able to successfully upload the iBook, and Apple doesn’t provide any helpful suggestions about why this is occurring. I’m sure these are just teething problems, but looking at the Apple support forums there seem to be a lot of other very frustrated people having the same problem.

We have, however, made a direct link to our iBook available for people to download, and this seems to work quite well.

In your opinion, do you think ordinary physicians would be able to create decent textbooks using this setup?

Dr. Wallitt: Yes absolutely. From a technical perspective it is very easy. I suspect the issue for ordinary physicians will be access to open source medical images and videos to create variety and compelling content for their textbooks.

Do you have any plans to create more iBooks?

Dr. Wallitt: Yes, we are planning to produce a whole series of iBooks covering topics throughout medicine, surgery, and the clinical specialties. In addition to that, we are planning to expand upon our current iBook, ‘The Podmedics do Surgery’, by adding more chapters.

Were there any further interesting issues encountered during the publishing process?

Dr. Wallitt: We have had great difficulties in getting our iBook published. This is not because Apple have not approved the content, but because the process of uploading iBooks to the iBook store seems to be broken at the moment. Additionally, Apple is not currently providing any useful support to authors of iBooks to resolve the problems that they seem to be having. Saying that, iBooks author and its publishing infrastructure is only a few weeks old, so I’m sure these issues will eventually be ironed out.

Given that it is still possible to export completed iBooks manually, and publish them independently I would still encourage anyone who had an interest in creating an iBook to do so. We certainly have had great fun!

Price: Free

Summary:
-Combination of interactive features offer insight into potential future of medical education
-This textbook, while relatively basic, shows how engaging users with interactive learning can be beneficial. Hopefully, we will see more interactive textbooks created by physicians arriving in the Apple Bookstore.
-Check out this thread in the forum for more information related to physician-led iBook development

 

iTunes link: Currently in Apple approval process. However, you can download it here (~90MB) – http://podmedics-do-surgery.s3.amazonaws.com/ThePodmedicsDoSurgery.ibooks

To add it to your iPad (with iBooks 2) you need to:
-Click the link above with your iPad (it will take some time to download) and then choose the option to ‘Open in iBooks’ OR
-Download the book from the link above on your home computer, and then drag it into iTunes. You should then be able to sync it to your iPad in the usual fashion.

www.podmedics.com

First interactive medical iPad iBook arrives in Apple’s bookstore, free to download

http://cdn.imedicalapps.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/01-300x225.png

When Apple announced iBooks 2 and iBooks author, there was much excitement amongst the medical tech community about the possibility of physicians creating their own interactive textbooks.

Last Friday saw the release of the first interactive medical textbook, created by Dr. Ed Wallitt, Founder of Podmedics.com.

We recently reviewed PodMedics, a UK based site which offers a range of medical podcasts for medical students and junior doctors alike.

The iBook entitled, The Podmedics Do Surgery, is a free medical textbook designed for medical students. It combines text, interactive images, video lectures and questions in one place and is a first for medical education.

iMedicalApps was able to exclusively catch up with Dr. Wallitt and find out more about the creation process including his experiences using iBooks Author.

Why did you pick the iBooks format?

Dr. Wallitt: The new iBooks format provides the opportunity to provide a wide range of different types of learning materials in one integrated textbook. It goes beyond just simple text, allowing you to insert interactive images, videos and review questions. This is perfect for us at Podmedics because we have been using these materials on our website.

Secondly, we saw the opportunity to be at the cutting edge of this brand-new and exciting technological advance in medical education.

What was your experience of using iBooks author?

Dr. Wallitt: On the whole, very positive. If you have any experience with using applications from iWorks such as Keynote, Pages or Numbers it is very easy to pick up. Myself, Stevan Wing and Bernard Ho managed to put together the whole iBook within a couple of weeks, working on it on the odd evening and weekend.

Saying that, there are still a number of issues within the program. This mainly has to do with crafting the flow of your document so that it displays well in both portrait and landscape mode on the iPad. We had to do a number of revisions because of this problem, and it cost us a significant amount of time.

Many authors have voiced concerns about the user agreement. What is your opinion of this?

Dr. Wallitt: It is easy to understand why people might be upset with having to hand over their work to Apple for approval. However, this is not really different to the state of play within the App Store and is fairly consistent across the whole industry. Most companies that provide creative tools that allow users to create content for their platforms have a similar end user agreement.

At Podmedics we did not spend a long time looking at this because we wanted to produce a free textbook and the user agreement is therefore not as punitive towards us compared with paid books.

Could you elaborate on the overall difficulty of textbook creation from a technical viewpoint?

Dr. Wallitt: From a technical perspective it was incredibly easy to create. In the past, to create a similar textbook would have required a detailed knowledge of Xcode, Objective-C and Cocoa touch. However with iBooks author, Apple have created a gateway for anyone with any word processing ability to create compelling and high-quality content.

What were the major problems encountered in the process?

Dr. Wallitt: The biggest issue for us has been managing to get the completed iBook uploaded and published on the iBook store. The textbook iBook store is currently not available in the UK, but UK authors of iBooks can still publish them on the US store. However, we have still not even been able to successfully upload the iBook, and Apple doesn’t provide any helpful suggestions about why this is occurring. I’m sure these are just teething problems, but looking at the Apple support forums there seem to be a lot of other very frustrated people having the same problem.

We have, however, made a direct link to our iBook available for people to download, and this seems to work quite well.

In your opinion, do you think ordinary physicians would be able to create decent textbooks using this setup?

Dr. Wallitt: Yes absolutely. From a technical perspective it is very easy. I suspect the issue for ordinary physicians will be access to open source medical images and videos to create variety and compelling content for their textbooks.

Do you have any plans to create more iBooks?

Dr. Wallitt: Yes, we are planning to produce a whole series of iBooks covering topics throughout medicine, surgery, and the clinical specialties. In addition to that, we are planning to expand upon our current iBook, ‘The Podmedics do Surgery’, by adding more chapters.

Were there any further interesting issues encountered during the publishing process?

Dr. Wallitt: We have had great difficulties in getting our iBook published. This is not because Apple have not approved the content, but because the process of uploading iBooks to the iBook store seems to be broken at the moment. Additionally, Apple is not currently providing any useful support to authors of iBooks to resolve the problems that they seem to be having. Saying that, iBooks author and its publishing infrastructure is only a few weeks old, so I’m sure these issues will eventually be ironed out.

Given that it is still possible to export completed iBooks manually, and publish them independently I would still encourage anyone who had an interest in creating an iBook to do so. We certainly have had great fun!

Price: Free

Summary:
-Combination of interactive features offer insight into potential future of medical education
-This textbook, while relatively basic, shows how engaging users with interactive learning can be beneficial. Hopefully, we will see more interactive textbooks created by physicians arriving in the Apple Bookstore.
-Check out this thread in the forum for more information related to physician-led iBook development

 

iTunes link: Currently in Apple approval process. However, you can download it here (~90MB) – http://podmedics-do-surgery.s3.amazonaws.com/ThePodmedicsDoSurgery.ibooks

To add it to your iPad (with iBooks 2) you need to:
-Click the link above with your iPad (it will take some time to download) and then choose the option to ‘Open in iBooks’ OR
-Download the book from the link above on your home computer, and then drag it into iTunes. You should then be able to sync it to your iPad in the usual fashion.

www.podmedics.com

First interactive medical iPad iBook arrives in Apple’s bookstore, free to download

http://cdn.imedicalapps.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/01-300x225.png

When Apple announced iBooks 2 and iBooks author, there was much excitement amongst the medical tech community about the possibility of physicians creating their own interactive textbooks.

Last Friday saw the release of the first interactive medical textbook, created by Dr. Ed Wallitt, Founder of Podmedics.com.

We recently reviewed PodMedics, a UK based site which offers a range of medical podcasts for medical students and junior doctors alike.

The iBook entitled, The Podmedics Do Surgery, is a free medical textbook designed for medical students. It combines text, interactive images, video lectures and questions in one place and is a first for medical education.

iMedicalApps was able to exclusively catch up with Dr. Wallitt and find out more about the creation process including his experiences using iBooks Author.

Why did you pick the iBooks format?

Dr. Wallitt: The new iBooks format provides the opportunity to provide a wide range of different types of learning materials in one integrated textbook. It goes beyond just simple text, allowing you to insert interactive images, videos and review questions. This is perfect for us at Podmedics because we have been using these materials on our website.

Secondly, we saw the opportunity to be at the cutting edge of this brand-new and exciting technological advance in medical education.

What was your experience of using iBooks author?

Dr. Wallitt: On the whole, very positive. If you have any experience with using applications from iWorks such as Keynote, Pages or Numbers it is very easy to pick up. Myself, Stevan Wing and Bernard Ho managed to put together the whole iBook within a couple of weeks, working on it on the odd evening and weekend.

Saying that, there are still a number of issues within the program. This mainly has to do with crafting the flow of your document so that it displays well in both portrait and landscape mode on the iPad. We had to do a number of revisions because of this problem, and it cost us a significant amount of time.

Many authors have voiced concerns about the user agreement. What is your opinion of this?

Dr. Wallitt: It is easy to understand why people might be upset with having to hand over their work to Apple for approval. However, this is not really different to the state of play within the App Store and is fairly consistent across the whole industry. Most companies that provide creative tools that allow users to create content for their platforms have a similar end user agreement.

At Podmedics we did not spend a long time looking at this because we wanted to produce a free textbook and the user agreement is therefore not as punitive towards us compared with paid books.

Could you elaborate on the overall difficulty of textbook creation from a technical viewpoint?

Dr. Wallitt: From a technical perspective it was incredibly easy to create. In the past, to create a similar textbook would have required a detailed knowledge of Xcode, Objective-C and Cocoa touch. However with iBooks author, Apple have created a gateway for anyone with any word processing ability to create compelling and high-quality content.

What were the major problems encountered in the process?

Dr. Wallitt: The biggest issue for us has been managing to get the completed iBook uploaded and published on the iBook store. The textbook iBook store is currently not available in the UK, but UK authors of iBooks can still publish them on the US store. However, we have still not even been able to successfully upload the iBook, and Apple doesn’t provide any helpful suggestions about why this is occurring. I’m sure these are just teething problems, but looking at the Apple support forums there seem to be a lot of other very frustrated people having the same problem.

We have, however, made a direct link to our iBook available for people to download, and this seems to work quite well.

In your opinion, do you think ordinary physicians would be able to create decent textbooks using this setup?

Dr. Wallitt: Yes absolutely. From a technical perspective it is very easy. I suspect the issue for ordinary physicians will be access to open source medical images and videos to create variety and compelling content for their textbooks.

Do you have any plans to create more iBooks?

Dr. Wallitt: Yes, we are planning to produce a whole series of iBooks covering topics throughout medicine, surgery, and the clinical specialties. In addition to that, we are planning to expand upon our current iBook, ‘The Podmedics do Surgery’, by adding more chapters.

Were there any further interesting issues encountered during the publishing process?

Dr. Wallitt: We have had great difficulties in getting our iBook published. This is not because Apple have not approved the content, but because the process of uploading iBooks to the iBook store seems to be broken at the moment. Additionally, Apple is not currently providing any useful support to authors of iBooks to resolve the problems that they seem to be having. Saying that, iBooks author and its publishing infrastructure is only a few weeks old, so I’m sure these issues will eventually be ironed out.

Given that it is still possible to export completed iBooks manually, and publish them independently I would still encourage anyone who had an interest in creating an iBook to do so. We certainly have had great fun!

Price: Free

Summary:
-Combination of interactive features offer insight into potential future of medical education
-This textbook, while relatively basic, shows how engaging users with interactive learning can be beneficial. Hopefully, we will see more interactive textbooks created by physicians arriving in the Apple Bookstore.
-Check out this thread in the forum for more information related to physician-led iBook development

 

iTunes link: Currently in Apple approval process. However, you can download it here (~90MB) – http://podmedics-do-surgery.s3.amazonaws.com/ThePodmedicsDoSurgery.ibooks

To add it to your iPad (with iBooks 2) you need to:
-Click the link above with your iPad (it will take some time to download) and then choose the option to ‘Open in iBooks’ OR
-Download the book from the link above on your home computer, and then drag it into iTunes. You should then be able to sync it to your iPad in the usual fashion.

www.podmedics.com

First interactive medical iPad iBook arrives in Apple’s bookstore, free to download

http://cdn.imedicalapps.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/01-300x225.png

When Apple announced iBooks 2 and iBooks author, there was much excitement amongst the medical tech community about the possibility of physicians creating their own interactive textbooks.

Last Friday saw the release of the first interactive medical textbook, created by Dr. Ed Wallitt, Founder of Podmedics.com.

We recently reviewed PodMedics, a UK based site which offers a range of medical podcasts for medical students and junior doctors alike.

The iBook entitled, The Podmedics Do Surgery, is a free medical textbook designed for medical students. It combines text, interactive images, video lectures and questions in one place and is a first for medical education.

iMedicalApps was able to exclusively catch up with Dr. Wallitt and find out more about the creation process including his experiences using iBooks Author.

Why did you pick the iBooks format?

Dr. Wallitt: The new iBooks format provides the opportunity to provide a wide range of different types of learning materials in one integrated textbook. It goes beyond just simple text, allowing you to insert interactive images, videos and review questions. This is perfect for us at Podmedics because we have been using these materials on our website.

Secondly, we saw the opportunity to be at the cutting edge of this brand-new and exciting technological advance in medical education.

What was your experience of using iBooks author?

Dr. Wallitt: On the whole, very positive. If you have any experience with using applications from iWorks such as Keynote, Pages or Numbers it is very easy to pick up. Myself, Stevan Wing and Bernard Ho managed to put together the whole iBook within a couple of weeks, working on it on the odd evening and weekend.

Saying that, there are still a number of issues within the program. This mainly has to do with crafting the flow of your document so that it displays well in both portrait and landscape mode on the iPad. We had to do a number of revisions because of this problem, and it cost us a significant amount of time.

Many authors have voiced concerns about the user agreement. What is your opinion of this?

Dr. Wallitt: It is easy to understand why people might be upset with having to hand over their work to Apple for approval. However, this is not really different to the state of play within the App Store and is fairly consistent across the whole industry. Most companies that provide creative tools that allow users to create content for their platforms have a similar end user agreement.

At Podmedics we did not spend a long time looking at this because we wanted to produce a free textbook and the user agreement is therefore not as punitive towards us compared with paid books.

Could you elaborate on the overall difficulty of textbook creation from a technical viewpoint?

Dr. Wallitt: From a technical perspective it was incredibly easy to create. In the past, to create a similar textbook would have required a detailed knowledge of Xcode, Objective-C and Cocoa touch. However with iBooks author, Apple have created a gateway for anyone with any word processing ability to create compelling and high-quality content.

What were the major problems encountered in the process?

Dr. Wallitt: The biggest issue for us has been managing to get the completed iBook uploaded and published on the iBook store. The textbook iBook store is currently not available in the UK, but UK authors of iBooks can still publish them on the US store. However, we have still not even been able to successfully upload the iBook, and Apple doesn’t provide any helpful suggestions about why this is occurring. I’m sure these are just teething problems, but looking at the Apple support forums there seem to be a lot of other very frustrated people having the same problem.

We have, however, made a direct link to our iBook available for people to download, and this seems to work quite well.

In your opinion, do you think ordinary physicians would be able to create decent textbooks using this setup?

Dr. Wallitt: Yes absolutely. From a technical perspective it is very easy. I suspect the issue for ordinary physicians will be access to open source medical images and videos to create variety and compelling content for their textbooks.

Do you have any plans to create more iBooks?

Dr. Wallitt: Yes, we are planning to produce a whole series of iBooks covering topics throughout medicine, surgery, and the clinical specialties. In addition to that, we are planning to expand upon our current iBook, ‘The Podmedics do Surgery’, by adding more chapters.

Were there any further interesting issues encountered during the publishing process?

Dr. Wallitt: We have had great difficulties in getting our iBook published. This is not because Apple have not approved the content, but because the process of uploading iBooks to the iBook store seems to be broken at the moment. Additionally, Apple is not currently providing any useful support to authors of iBooks to resolve the problems that they seem to be having. Saying that, iBooks author and its publishing infrastructure is only a few weeks old, so I’m sure these issues will eventually be ironed out.

Given that it is still possible to export completed iBooks manually, and publish them independently I would still encourage anyone who had an interest in creating an iBook to do so. We certainly have had great fun!

Price: Free

Summary:
-Combination of interactive features offer insight into potential future of medical education
-This textbook, while relatively basic, shows how engaging users with interactive learning can be beneficial. Hopefully, we will see more interactive textbooks created by physicians arriving in the Apple Bookstore.
-Check out this thread in the forum for more information related to physician-led iBook development

 

iTunes link: Currently in Apple approval process. However, you can download it here (~90MB) – http://podmedics-do-surgery.s3.amazonaws.com/ThePodmedicsDoSurgery.ibooks

To add it to your iPad (with iBooks 2) you need to:
-Click the link above with your iPad (it will take some time to download) and then choose the option to ‘Open in iBooks’ OR
-Download the book from the link above on your home computer, and then drag it into iTunes. You should then be able to sync it to your iPad in the usual fashion.

www.podmedics.com

Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency launches iPad program

Post image for Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency launches iPad program

[Ed. Note: This post will be part of an ongoing series on the efforts of the Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine program to go mobile. Given that Dr. Misra (iMedicalApps senior editor) is part of this effort, we will be able to share an honest, insider perspective that can help others learn from the Hopkins experience. Not only was this permitted by the Hopkins program leadership, it was embraced, and for that we are grateful. ]

Medical training is currently undergoing a dramatic change. Duty hour reforms, increasing financial and regulatory demands, and a healthcare system at the center of a political battle are among the extraordinary pressures being exerted on the traditional training model.

These pressures require that training programs at all levels – from medical school to the most sub-specialized fellowships – rethink how we do pretty much everything.

Recently, the Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency program distributed iPads to its housestaff as part of an effort to do just that. The aims of the program are quite broad – to increase the efficiency of in-hospital care, enhance clinical training of residents, improve patient-physician communication, and more.

The mobile platform is relatively young in terms of its utilization in healthcare and many of the potential applications, benefits, and pitfalls remain to be discovered. As this program continues to grow and evolve, iMedicalApps will continue to share the the insider perspective on the Hopkins experience as part of our shared desire to drive this process forward. In this first installment, we’ll start by addressing the question – why the iPad?

Why the iPad

There are many tablet’s out there that are similar, and in some ways, better than the iPad. In fact, Apple is in a legal dispute with Samsung because they claim the Galaxy tab is a repackaged iPad. And the question certainly came up – why not go with another tablet? Android is arguably a more malleable platform than iOS, many of the tablets are cheaper, and there are many more options.  We’ve had great debates on iMedicalApps in the past about this subject.

Here are a few reasons why we went with the iPad.

The iPad has a head start

When looking to launch a mobile platform, you have to consider your audience. And in any clinical practice, that will include a range of familiarity with consumer technologies, specifically in this case tablets. Among those that were already using tablets, all of them were using iPads. That simple detail confers a number of advantages.

First, with the iPad, we have a group of individuals who are already “embedded” within the our audience. So not only had their use of the device already piqued the interest of others, they also were engaged in this program from the beginning. After launch, these individuals can provide both formal and informal help to colleagues who are less familiar with the device and platform.

Second, in terms of program planning and development, we already had a wealth of experience due to using the iPad in our own institution. These early adopters had already problem-solved a number of issues, found some of the potential efficiencies to be gained, and even identified potential new applications and enhancements.

Third, the launch of the iPad program at the University of Chicago was certainly helpful as their program leadership was quite forthcoming with their own experiences.

The choice Android offers wasn’t all that helpful

Choice is a great thing for the average consumer, but not necessarily for an enterprise. In considering Android as an option, several issues arose that led us to conclude that the iPad was the best choice.  One of the main issues — choosing an Android device involves several extra steps.

First, we would likely order a few different devices, test them out, and then, for practical reasons, probably pick one device. Picking more than one would complicate everything from picking accessories to device management by the IT folks. And if were going to choose a single device in the end, then the value of choice for individual housestaff is ultimately lost anyways.

Another argument could be made that Android potentially offers cost-savings in comparison to the iPad. However, we determined early on that we didn’t need the 3G connectivity nor did we need the 32gb memory. Our application of the device is primarily for in-hospital use where WiFi connectivity is available – this makes the 16gb WiFi iPad the natural choice and very competitive in terms of pricing, roughly $500.00.

What about apps?

Apps are a big part of success of any mobile platform. We’ve talked before about how their absence in the Blackberry and Windows environments are an Achille’s heel for those platforms. However, the difference between iPad and Android apps did not end up being a significant factor in the selection of the iPad as our platform of choice.

Perhaps it was the sense of parity between iPad and Android, given that most major apps are available on both. Additionally, the issue of app compatibility across different Android devices was less of a concern since we would most likely only be dealing with one Android device anyways.

These reasons, among others, were major drivers in our selection of the iPad as the platform of choice in our efforts to go mobile. Please share your thoughts and experiences below as we’d love to hear and learn from other efforts.

Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency launches iPad program

[Ed. Note: This post will be part of an ongoing series on the efforts of the Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine program to go mobile. Given that Dr. Misra (iMedicalApps senior editor) is part of this effort, we will be able to share an honest, insider perspective that can help others learn from the Hopkins experience. Not only was this permitted by the Hopkins program leadership, it was embraced, and for that we are grateful. ]

Medical training is currently undergoing a dramatic change. Duty hour reforms, increasing financial and regulatory demands, and a healthcare system at the center of a political battle are among the extraordinary pressures being exerted on the traditional training model.

These pressures require that training programs at all levels – from medical school to the most sub-specialized fellowships – rethink how we do pretty much everything.

Recently, the Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency program distributed iPads to its housestaff as part of an effort to do just that. The aims of the program are quite broad – to increase the efficiency of in-hospital care, enhance clinical training of residents, improve patient-physician communication, and more.

The mobile platform is relatively young in terms of its utilization in healthcare and many of the potential applications, benefits, and pitfalls remain to be discovered. As this program continues to grow and evolve, iMedicalApps will continue to share the the insider perspective on the Hopkins experience as part of our shared desire to drive this process forward. In this first installment, we’ll start by addressing the question – why the iPad?

Why the iPad

There are many tablet’s out there that are similar, and in some ways, better than the iPad. In fact, Apple is in a legal dispute with Samsung because they claim the Galaxy tab is a repackaged iPad. And the question certainly came up – why not go with another tablet? Android is arguably a more malleable platform than iOS, many of the tablets are cheaper, and there are many more options.  We’ve had great debates on iMedicalApps in the past about this subject.

Here are a few reasons why we went with the iPad.

The iPad has a head start

When looking to launch a mobile platform, you have to consider your audience. And in any clinical practice, that will include a range of familiarity with consumer technologies, specifically in this case tablets. Among those that were already using tablets, all of them were using iPads. That simple detail confers a number of advantages.

First, with the iPad, we have a group of individuals who are already “embedded” within the our audience. So not only had their use of the device already piqued the interest of others, they also were engaged in this program from the beginning. After launch, these individuals can provide both formal and informal help to colleagues who are less familiar with the device and platform.

Second, in terms of program planning and development, we already had a wealth of experience due to using the iPad in our own institution. These early adopters had already problem-solved a number of issues, found some of the potential efficiencies to be gained, and even identified potential new applications and enhancements.

Third, the launch of the iPad program at the University of Chicago was certainly helpful as their program leadership was quite forthcoming with their own experiences.

The choice Android offers wasn’t all that helpful

Choice is a great thing for the average consumer, but not necessarily for an enterprise. In considering Android as an option, several issues arose that led us to conclude that the iPad was the best choice.  One of the main issues — choosing an Android device involves several extra steps.

First, we would likely order a few different devices, test them out, and then, for practical reasons, probably pick one device. Picking more than one would complicate everything from picking accessories to device management by the IT folks. And if were going to choose a single device in the end, then the value of choice for individual housestaff is ultimately lost anyways.

Another argument could be made that Android potentially offers cost-savings in comparison to the iPad. However, we determined early on that we didn’t need the 3G connectivity nor did we need the 32gb memory. Our application of the device is primarily for in-hospital use where WiFi connectivity is available – this makes the 16gb WiFi iPad the natural choice and very competitive in terms of pricing, roughly $500.00.

What about apps?

Apps are a big part of success of any mobile platform. We’ve talked before about how their absence in the Blackberry and Windows environments are an Achille’s heel for those platforms. However, the difference between iPad and Android apps did not end up being a significant factor in the selection of the iPad as our platform of choice.

Perhaps it was the sense of parity between iPad and Android, given that most major apps are available on both. Additionally, the issue of app compatibility across different Android devices was less of a concern since we would most likely only be dealing with one Android device anyways.

These reasons, among others, were major drivers in our selection of the iPad as the platform of choice in our efforts to go mobile. Please share your thoughts and experiences below as we’d love to hear and learn from other efforts.


Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency launches iPad program

Post image for Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency launches iPad program

[Ed. Note: This post will be part of an ongoing series on the efforts of the Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine program to go mobile. Given that Dr. Misra (iMedicalApps senior editor) is part of this effort, we will be able to share an honest, insider perspective that can help others learn from the Hopkins experience. Not only was this permitted by the Hopkins program leadership, it was embraced, and for that we are grateful. ]

Medical training is currently undergoing a dramatic change. Duty hour reforms, increasing financial and regulatory demands, and a healthcare system at the center of a political battle are among the extraordinary pressures being exerted on the traditional training model.

These pressures require that training programs at all levels – from medical school to the most sub-specialized fellowships – rethink how we do pretty much everything.

Recently, the Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency program distributed iPads to its housestaff as part of an effort to do just that. The aims of the program are quite broad – to increase the efficiency of in-hospital care, enhance clinical training of residents, improve patient-physician communication, and more.

The mobile platform is relatively young in terms of its utilization in healthcare and many of the potential applications, benefits, and pitfalls remain to be discovered. As this program continues to grow and evolve, iMedicalApps will continue to share the the insider perspective on the Hopkins experience as part of our shared desire to drive this process forward. In this first installment, we’ll start by addressing the question – why the iPad?

Why the iPad

There are many tablet’s out there that are similar, and in some ways, better than the iPad. In fact, Apple is in a legal dispute with Samsung because they claim the Galaxy tab is a repackaged iPad. And the question certainly came up – why not go with another tablet? Android is arguably a more malleable platform than iOS, many of the tablets are cheaper, and there are many more options.  We’ve had great debates on iMedicalApps in the past about this subject.

Here are a few reasons why we went with the iPad.

The iPad has a head start

When looking to launch a mobile platform, you have to consider your audience. And in any clinical practice, that will include a range of familiarity with consumer technologies, specifically in this case tablets. Among those that were already using tablets, all of them were using iPads. That simple detail confers a number of advantages.

First, with the iPad, we have a group of individuals who are already “embedded” within the our audience. So not only had their use of the device already piqued the interest of others, they also were engaged in this program from the beginning. After launch, these individuals can provide both formal and informal help to colleagues who are less familiar with the device and platform.

Second, in terms of program planning and development, we already had a wealth of experience due to using the iPad in our own institution. These early adopters had already problem-solved a number of issues, found some of the potential efficiencies to be gained, and even identified potential new applications and enhancements.

Third, the launch of the iPad program at the University of Chicago was certainly helpful as their program leadership was quite forthcoming with their own experiences.

The choice Android offers wasn’t all that helpful

Choice is a great thing for the average consumer, but not necessarily for an enterprise. In considering Android as an option, several issues arose that led us to conclude that the iPad was the best choice.  One of the main issues — choosing an Android device involves several extra steps.

First, we would likely order a few different devices, test them out, and then, for practical reasons, probably pick one device. Picking more than one would complicate everything from picking accessories to device management by the IT folks. And if were going to choose a single device in the end, then the value of choice for individual housestaff is ultimately lost anyways.

Another argument could be made that Android potentially offers cost-savings in comparison to the iPad. However, we determined early on that we didn’t need the 3G connectivity nor did we need the 32gb memory. Our application of the device is primarily for in-hospital use where WiFi connectivity is available – this makes the 16gb WiFi iPad the natural choice and very competitive in terms of pricing, roughly $500.00.

What about apps?

Apps are a big part of success of any mobile platform. We’ve talked before about how their absence in the Blackberry and Windows environments are an Achille’s heel for those platforms. However, the difference between iPad and Android apps did not end up being a significant factor in the selection of the iPad as our platform of choice.

Perhaps it was the sense of parity between iPad and Android, given that most major apps are available on both. Additionally, the issue of app compatibility across different Android devices was less of a concern since we would most likely only be dealing with one Android device anyways.

These reasons, among others, were major drivers in our selection of the iPad as the platform of choice in our efforts to go mobile. Please share your thoughts and experiences below as we’d love to hear and learn from other efforts.

Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency launches iPad program

Post image for Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency launches iPad program

[Ed. Note: This post will be part of an ongoing series on the efforts of the Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine program to go mobile. Given that Dr. Misra (iMedicalApps senior editor) is part of this effort, we will be able to share an honest, insider perspective that can help others learn from the Hopkins experience. Not only was this permitted by the Hopkins program leadership, it was embraced, and for that we are grateful. ]

Medical training is currently undergoing a dramatic change. Duty hour reforms, increasing financial and regulatory demands, and a healthcare system at the center of a political battle are among the extraordinary pressures being exerted on the traditional training model.

These pressures require that training programs at all levels – from medical school to the most sub-specialized fellowships – rethink how we do pretty much everything.

Recently, the Johns Hopkins Internal Medicine residency program distributed iPads to its housestaff as part of an effort to do just that. The aims of the program are quite broad – to increase the efficiency of in-hospital care, enhance clinical training of residents, improve patient-physician communication, and more.

The mobile platform is relatively young in terms of its utilization in healthcare and many of the potential applications, benefits, and pitfalls remain to be discovered. As this program continues to grow and evolve, iMedicalApps will continue to share the the insider perspective on the Hopkins experience as part of our shared desire to drive this process forward. In this first installment, we’ll start by addressing the question – why the iPad?

Why the iPad

There are many tablet’s out there that are similar, and in some ways, better than the iPad. In fact, Apple is in a legal dispute with Samsung because they claim the Galaxy tab is a repackaged iPad. And the question certainly came up – why not go with another tablet? Android is arguably a more malleable platform than iOS, many of the tablets are cheaper, and there are many more options.  We’ve had great debates on iMedicalApps in the past about this subject.

Here are a few reasons why we went with the iPad.

The iPad has a head start

When looking to launch a mobile platform, you have to consider your audience. And in any clinical practice, that will include a range of familiarity with consumer technologies, specifically in this case tablets. Among those that were already using tablets, all of them were using iPads. That simple detail confers a number of advantages.

First, with the iPad, we have a group of individuals who are already “embedded” within the our audience. So not only had their use of the device already piqued the interest of others, they also were engaged in this program from the beginning. After launch, these individuals can provide both formal and informal help to colleagues who are less familiar with the device and platform.

Second, in terms of program planning and development, we already had a wealth of experience due to using the iPad in our own institution. These early adopters had already problem-solved a number of issues, found some of the potential efficiencies to be gained, and even identified potential new applications and enhancements.

Third, the launch of the iPad program at the University of Chicago was certainly helpful as their program leadership was quite forthcoming with their own experiences.

The choice Android offers wasn’t all that helpful

Choice is a great thing for the average consumer, but not necessarily for an enterprise. In considering Android as an option, several issues arose that led us to conclude that the iPad was the best choice.  One of the main issues — choosing an Android device involves several extra steps.

First, we would likely order a few different devices, test them out, and then, for practical reasons, probably pick one device. Picking more than one would complicate everything from picking accessories to device management by the IT folks. And if were going to choose a single device in the end, then the value of choice for individual housestaff is ultimately lost anyways.

Another argument could be made that Android potentially offers cost-savings in comparison to the iPad. However, we determined early on that we didn’t need the 3G connectivity nor did we need the 32gb memory. Our application of the device is primarily for in-hospital use where WiFi connectivity is available – this makes the 16gb WiFi iPad the natural choice and very competitive in terms of pricing, roughly $500.00.

What about apps?

Apps are a big part of success of any mobile platform. We’ve talked before about how their absence in the Blackberry and Windows environments are an Achille’s heel for those platforms. However, the difference between iPad and Android apps did not end up being a significant factor in the selection of the iPad as our platform of choice.

Perhaps it was the sense of parity between iPad and Android, given that most major apps are available on both. Additionally, the issue of app compatibility across different Android devices was less of a concern since we would most likely only be dealing with one Android device anyways.

These reasons, among others, were major drivers in our selection of the iPad as the platform of choice in our efforts to go mobile. Please share your thoughts and experiences below as we’d love to hear and learn from other efforts.